To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
BeloglazowaYlya – :
FYI, this is the same as the Fragrantica listing Gale Hayman Beverly Hills. The notes there are more accurate; so, you might want to cross reference.
tcf669Negeltzex – :
This is a beautiful retro perfume. It smells more 90’s than 80’s. Lots of unidentified flowers. It’s probably lots of jasmines and white flowers like tuberose and gardenia. The flowers are the big players. It does tend to smell mature but very classy and sophisticated if outdated. It’s not too far from smelling a bit like original Giorgio Beverly Hills, however this is lighter and more like powder. This makes me feel very glamorous and elegant but in a classic way. It’s like something for Elizabeth Taylor or Vivien Leigh on Oscar Night. It’s got a very good sandalwood at the end so if you like florals and sandalwood check this out. I don’t mind wearing older frags because they are not common and you always get someone asking you o my that smells so good what is that. I wear this during my lounge singer gigs. It matches with long evening gowns.
vidobest – :
Glamour by Gale Hayman is indeed glamorous. I smelled this one for a long time on myself trying to figure it out. It’s a floral musk with vanilla which sounds pretty simple and ordinary but it’s got a lot going on. There is a naughty civet that makes this fragrance rather too indolic and super musky and unisex. I like to compare it to a more intense Paloma Picasso and indeed as someone else pointed out very similar to original Bal a Versailles. The floral notes are white jasmine for days. Lots of jasmine in this perfume. The sandalwood is noticeable and probably the best part of the fragrance. This is very strong and I mean strong. The first spritz is scary. I spritzed it in front of a girlfriend who stood behind me in the public bathroom of a hotel and she was sneezing lol…This is a typical Fred Hayman-Gale Hayman fragrance the same duo that brought you Giorgio Beverly Hills. All their scents are strong but Gale, Fred’s wife and later ex-wife, knew where to draw the line. There is something in this scent that makes it sweet, very nice if applied properly. One spritz on your neck and you’re good to go. There could be vanilla in this and definitely a sweet rose scent. This feels very nice on my clothes as well. Gale’s Sunset Boulevard is also really such a beautiful fragrance. It’s a pity Gale Hayman does not get as much appreciation for her contributions in fragrance as Sophia Grojsman. I love Gale’s perfumes a lot. They are glamorous and very Old Hollywood in their imagery and feelings. This is something I could smell on Gloria Swanson, Sophia Loren and Elizabeth Taylor. This is an Oriental fragrance of class power and beauty.
rolexreplica42670 – :
Just received my vintage 1/4 oz. of perfume today 🙂 As beautiful as I remember it to be, absolutely. Rich, full, lovely. Better suited to fall and winter than summer. Definitely an evening perfume. Actually, the drydown is very similar to the rich top notes of Bal a Versailles. Beautiful bottle.
ferstalex – :
The original “Glamour” is not similar to Amarige. The closest would be Lancetti’s “Via Condotti”. “Glamour” is kind of a particular perfume, it has way too much civet. Maybe with age civet intensifies, I don’t know. Still it is a beautiful and not ordinary scent.
dimadabit – :
This one smells like Amarige to me..If you like Amarige,you might like this one.