To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Lencemope – :
To me, the opening was rather nasty with a jarring fruit note that didn’t agree at all with my skin chemistry. Or my nose.
After a while it descends into familiar fruitchouli territory(though I can’t see any patch among the notes, not even on EF’s own website)and loses all originality. And after a couple of hours it was more or less gone, with just something faintly woodsy remaining.
I see no reason to choose FFL from all the 1000+ similar scents. If this style of perfume is your thing there are better fragrances than this out there.
Mag39 – :
This is like, a “for real grown-up” perfume. Hence, not really for me. It smells like something ones mom or grandma would wear. Too “perfumey” if that makes sense..
Sample available.
lelik_561 – :
The cinnamon and coconut were detectable right from the start, not too heavy or sticky…somehow fresh. And while I really loved the opening, it’s almost like the fragrance is all top notes and has no base. It doesn’t dry down the way a quality scent should. It smells cheap and unsubstantial very quickly. But, wow! What a beautiful opening!
dimmaz – :
Fool for love is nice, soft, smooth, a bit creamy, spicy just a tad, I find it very demure, and not anything real exciting…like Poopoo Pidoo it is a bit foody, I detect the frangipani, overall not bad but not anything I am excited to get…
It could have been a lot more than what it is..
Deroxlzzsq – :
Both reviewers have summed this up well, this reminded me of a pina colada at first, a really nice one with a tropical white flower thrown in the mix. The cinnamon I could smell at first is a light dusting of non-sweet cinnamon, not strong or red hot, then the frangipani takes centre stage underscored by an alcoholic coconut, like coconut steeped in rum. It’s nice but mixed with frangipani it sometimes gets a weird tropical vibe. I’m not generally a fan of frangipani so that could be why I’m not loving it. Then again im
Not a huge fan of smelling like a mixed drink. There is also a nice amount of warm wood in there and all the notes play together, each being highlighted for a few minutes before something else takes over. All in all not a bad scent but doesn’t do anything special for me.
xvost666 – :
Fool for Love is my first experience from Ego Facto, I love the bottle and I think the name is very cute and the notes sound promising so I was eager to get my hands on a sample.
Having been wearing the fragrance for 2 days in a row all I can say that the scent is nowhere near as dramatic as one might expect based on the name.
All I can smell is frangipani which makes it quite a tropical floral composition underlined with just a light hint of cinnamon but to be honest if I didn`t know it`s supposed to be cinnamon I`m not sure I would even recognize it, very faint but it gives the fragrance a certain warmth. Not much coconut to my nose in here unfortunately which is a real letdown as I always love some coconut in my perfumes.
It is a very nice, cheerful fragrance if frangipani is your thing but I don`t see myself investing in a bottle soon because I just simply don`t detect anything special in this fragrance. Surely it`s nice though and gets my Like.
Longevity is good, about 6 hours on my skin with medium-low sillage.
My search for a quality tropical-coconut fragrance goes on.
Godrik – :
Very original, as all the fragrances I know created by Laurent Bruyere. I’m not a big fan of cinnamon but one can hardly smell it in this fragrance. The main note obvious from the beginning is the rhum-coco punch accord underlined with a nice sugar glazing powdery-white flowerish scent (probably the frangipani flower) and ending in a teck wood note. I would create a “foody-alcohol” special category for this one and Havana Vanille by L’artisan Parfumeur.