Description
Jimmy Choo launches Flash London Club, a limited edition flanker of Flash from 2013 signed by Christine Nagel. It is said to embody the spirit of the London party scene, night clubs and entertainment, since London is one of the focal points of electronic music.
The composition is a modern floral – fruity with a musk base and it apparently develops as the music at a party: starting fresh and sparkling with notes of bergamot and lychee, its heart beating with major tunes of tuberose that is “outrageously attractive”, descending into a soft and powdery base of blonde woods and musk.
The fragrance is available as 100 ml Eau de Parfum.
Flash London Club was launched in 2014.
jnya – :
Was too rosy for me. All I smell is citrus and tuberose. I feel that it’s just like the regular Jimmy Choo but here the notes are in reverse. Beautiful bottle but purple color and silver glitter doesn’t suit the fragrance
Баба-Дура – :
Flash?
“Flash” Guest bathroom soap.
Scent 3/ 10
Bottle 8 /10
Dioxingizexia – :
Ultra feminine. Though it doesnt really remind of a party scene but rather a vision of standing in a quiet garden with lots of flower in bloom. It gives off that warm delicious scent. Classy and subtle. Anyway, the first time i smelled this, i couldnt get it out of my head. And i really tried to not buy the bottle coz at that time, i thought it would be too sweet for the summer. But then lots of sniffing and 5 malls later, i finally gave in and went back for the bottle. I must say, it’s a very good buy..
fertibertik – :
Because I am a HUGE fan of Jimmy Choo Flash, I really wanted to try this one out. To me Flash & Flash London Club are very similar, except that in Flash I def get the pink pepper scent, which seems to make it smell sweeter on me. Flash London Club is Flash’s sister dressed for a night out in the warm Summer. This is like Flash, but fresher & a little more subtle. I wouldn’t care if they smelt exactly the same though, I absolutely adore Flash!
viktoria197 – :
bergamot and tuberose are my thing though bergamot is not contained in the original Flash. Soo yea I have both the original and this one, and love both, maybe the original abit more. Theres the same tuberose vibe going on in both but to me theyre a lot different. This one smells more generic than the first one, is more wearable, could be anyone’s cup of tea, its lighter, more crisp, still quite creamy but a lot less compared to the original which is a lot more fruity(tangerine, strawberry), sharp(pink pepper and intense tuberose esp in the drydown) and very creamy. The initial spray gives me a slight bubblegum scent (could be the litchi and bergamot blend) then the white florals take over and the musk gets the job done. Whereas the heliotrope in the original adds this intoxicating tone which is quite loud and can make someone nauseous if they overspray. Both are masterpieces in my book.
Plan x – :
I think it’s nice. The original Flash was too sharp for my taste, but this is wearable. It’s more creamy and sweet. Not too spicy or floral.
I like the woody base and lightly floral middle notes.
Not bad at all.
anx752elipseskism – :
So many dislikes… I’m surprised!
I find this fragrance to be rather gorgeous!!
I can’t distinguish the notes, but it just smells sooooo good to my nose (also to my fiance’s nose).
There’s just something about this that makes me want to keep sniffing myself.
It’s not overpowering, yet it’s lingering nicely. Sophisticated.
I love this one!!
derrida – :
Very interesting fragrance! It starts very nicely, with litchi and musk, and it truly vibrates on my skin. Unfortunately, later I can smell a lot of tuberose which is NOT my favorite floral note. What a shame.
If you can tolerate strong tuberose, you should test it.
cred2110 – :
I got this off eBay for a decent price, but it’s so similar to the original that I cannot even tell the difference. Oh well, at least the bottle is slightly different, LOL
Mas_Kameleon – :
The scent of this fragrance is better than the original in my opinion because it has less tuberose (smells too old fashioned to my liking) and the notes are better defined despite the fewer amount of ingredients. The only downside of this scent compared to the original is the longevity. I would say this is an EDT version of the original. The glitter on the bottle is also a bit tacky.
dest – :
Adorable bottle. But the notes sounds boring.