To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Tom-s – :
To me this was a clone of Davidoff’s Good Life which in itself is a great fragrance but you dont need another one like it. Its not the same of course but the overall vibe and direction strongly point towards GL.
ninakias19 – :
Citrusy, woody and a bit spicy. Musky and very dry. With a big dose of cardamom, lavender, vetiver and patchouli at dry down it is quite different from the original. Very interesting and complex blend. A great scent
ImmonsPof – :
Very dry. There is lavender (the only flower I detected), oakmoss, patchouli, vetiver, cardamom, caraway and some fruits, like pineapple and, perhaps, mandarin. I can´t smell any melon. It is not an easy-to-like fragrance, definitely not for the majority of youngsters. Much more differences than similarities from Tsar in terms of scent, but has the same clear masculine intention. I like it very much.
Tupmah – :
Don’t expect any strong sandalwood, patchouli, oakmoss, or vetiver here. I like the opening, but after an hour or so there’s mostly a fruity/lavender musk with a touch of spice. I’m not a fan of this kind of fragrance but I’d say it seems reasonably well done. My bottle will have to go up on my swap list because I’ve just got too many bottles now !
UPDATE: I think the same musks that are used in Michael for Men by Kors are used here, though most of the other notes are different. Once these molecules largely wear off, which takes a few hours, it smells quite good. I doubt many are as sensitive these molecules as I am, in terms of disliking them, but it’s something that at least some people probably want to know.
lvroman64 – :
it is hard to find the REAL EAU DU TSAR I got stuck with2 fake
orders from U.S.A
sapsonic – :
Once upon a time I had this flanker with its lovely frosted glass bottle. I don’t think I appreciated it enough at the time as I thought it was totally overshadowed by Tsar itself. However, in retrospect, I suspect that I also didn’t give it the credit it might have deserved and so I would like to find it and try it again and judge it more fairly on its own merits.
Noddegiouro – :
One of those flankers that ruin its original reputation: Take the original Tsar add some melon punch and voilà:Eau de Tsar.