To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Аренда техники – :
Yeah, I’m going to concur with @deadidol here. Huge aldehyde opening, soapy, sharp, sweet, chemically, and generally feminine, although this bills itself as a unisex. It is the smell of a magazine strip of whatever an older, female pop-star would “design”. I can’t believe the expense on this bottle. I am rather new to the world of fragrance, but even I can tell that this is either cheaply made, or expensively made by someone without taste. Thankfully the horrid opening calms down to a tolerable matronly handbag, which you must like to wear this since it is around for HOURS. The sillage thankfully is moderate, otherwise I would have left work and taken a shower because it smells like I;m having an affair with an old lady with delusions of youth.
If you find this appealing, go for Chanel. At least No. 5 actually HAS the musk it promises.
likilo90 – :
Even though I find this to be very bad, I’d say it’s the closest thing that this new glossy mag-aspiring “niche lifestyle brand” have created to actual perfume. It’s basically some isoraldine (violet chems) over an orris-y musk base, bodied up with holistic levels of aldehydes (C11 and probably C12). The soapyness has an acrid, bitter undertone, so I’d guess that lavender is to blame for that. Within 15 minutes, it smells exactly like an anonymous bar of soap (Dove, perhaps?) As with the rest of the line, it’s presented in a $2 Nemat bottle that’s been partially spray painted. Shamefully priced at $285 for 50ml, I’d suggest perhaps adding a decimal point after the 8.