To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
3lukas – :
Without the orange blossom and neroli this would be signature scent worthy for me. *sigh*
zub23 – :
This is the most nostalgic perfume to me. It smells identical to when I was young and in beauty pageants. Vacant rooms in old buildings, smell of tons of makeup and hairspray (particularly the Aussie brand) = this perfume to my nose. Its not a bad thing at all, it actually makes me keep wanting to sniff my arm over and over again. However, it’s not quite the thing I would want in my collection. Its more so something I’ll probably spritz when I pass it in the store just to be amazed at the nostalgia.
cerbed1 – :
Waaaaaaah. Holy moly.
First sniff at the decant… yeah ok… spray on..
What the everloving cumin curry leaf spicy monster is this?
Marshmallow you say?
Marshmallow madras??!
Get it off!!! Ugh. Just no. There’s something there that’s nice but it’s suffocating in spices.
Sorry D&G
FenderoK – :
I love this, much more than the original of this fragrance. It is rare I like a flanker more so than the original and I don’t know if it is just me but I feel a lot of work went in to making this fragrance unique and special. So I am surprised it hasn’t been popular. I think it probably got overlooked unfortunately. I would highly recommend trying to grab a bottle of this hidden gem. It is very different to the original version (not the original red cap from the 90’s but the re-release) and a lot more sophisticated. It is sweet but the woodsy notes add a beautiful balance without making it too woodsy and preventing it from being too sweet. I guess it reminds me a bit of Gucci in the purple bottle; it has a similar vibe to it. It’s quickly become a favorite for me and sad that it is so hard to find.
downlplkoi – :
Because smell and taste are closely associated and, in the case of gourmands veeery closely associated. It is a good description and not at all gross.
sausage795 – :
reminds me of the mid 90,s oldschool
sensual warm yet classic and sweet very candy sweet mouthwatering marshmallow neroli
the citrus and powderyness makes it also sophisticated serious and refreshing
Its quite dark
andruyak – :
The woods in this one are much much more prominent than in the original. This one smells more like a harsh woody root beer while the original smells like marshmallows and vanilla. I prefer the original personally.
PORTUHALEC – :
Bubblegum tuberose over sandalwood and vanilla. Sexy as hell. A light, diffuse spray works best.
aymerdur – :
Marshmallows covered in a light orange blossom water.
8800 – :
I’m looking for a 5/10ml decant in the UK. Please private message me if you are offering.
Bura87 – :
THIS one..omw words are failing me to describe it. Its absolutely awesome and hands down my favourite of all. Sweet fluffy cosy sexy! Love it!
sanya1990 – :
THIS fragrance is basically 85% the same of D&G pour femme, I can’t say it is more intense, no need to have both of them, I tend more to pour femme “the original”, as it is more romantic and stays more on ma body!
Arrextskede – :
Might I add that this fragrance works great in the romance department. I wore this on the vacation during which my daughter was conceived. Sorry if that’s tmi but it’s a testament to its sexiness, if you would
Nettwar – :
This smells a lot like bbw Japanese apple blossom and lotus. I don’t really know what a marshmallow is supposed to smells like before it’s roasted, so maybe it’s in there lol. I used to have this and never knew what was in it except I could easily identify the distinct orange blossom. Bit maybe the marshmallow is what explains the powderiness
vtt – :
I recently purchased this lovely fragrance. However, as elegant and stately as it is, I don’t think it is worthy of the price tag.
Cogmootly – :
Sweet perfume. Soft, tender, at times elegant, at times too girlish. I don’t get this sexy feeling that most sweet perfumes wear. The bottle is in a beautiful burgundy, but the sensation of the perfume is not that. Cozy, but not sexy.
zed112 – :
This is a very elegant yet sweet fragrance. The smell very represents the name “intense”. Hence, it is perfect for night parties and warm season. Strong, sexy, but still sweet at the same time.
z0_omz – :
The marshmallow note here translates as the softest, most powdery vanilla I’ve smelled in a perfume to date. The sandalwood somehow emphasizes the slight tang of an actual marshmallow and balances the gentle sweetness of the vanilla. The white florals are virtually undetectable to my nose, unless one were looking for the buttery note tuberose imparts deep within the base. Intense is a sweet, soft, warm perfume, but as others have said, it’s a bit of a misnomer.
Djiper – :
i’am not a fan of sweet perfumes, but this one is amazingggg. it’s not a too sweet to cause you headache.however,it smells juicy and very very sexy. It’s a warm winter perfume and very suitable for a date.
mik_c – :
I had a test of this today in Debenhams. They are selling it at a discounted price just now. Anyway I was not struck on it at all. The discontinued D&G Femme was magnificent. However this one is mediocre. It reminds me of Georgio by Beverly Hills.
Bullwais – :
I must say, this is a beautiful fragrance! On me it starts out smelling like Christian Dior Poison, which I’m not that fond of, but I’m glad I gave the sample I got a try on my skin. While I don’t get the full sweetness that everyone talks about, I get a powdery gentle sweetness.
It’s really worth giving it a chance. Ebay has lots of good prices on this stuff. At a store, I tried it, and then got a full bottle for 35.00 on ebay.
I pretty much wear it everyday now.
It lasts about 4-6 hours on me, so I bought some empty roll on dispensers on ebay and put some in there to take to work. Check it out. Give it a chance to dry down on your skin, and see how you like it. Worth a try.
никер май нейм – :
I’ll put the same review on the sites of Dolce & Gabbana Pour Femme and Pour Femme Intense. They are so similar to me that I can’t write two reviews.
Both are mainly powdery, vanillic marshmallow and tender white florals. Gentle and subtle gourmands everyone with a taste for sweets could wear, tween girls in school the same as grown women at work. The Intense version is not intense at all, the main difference is that the original is more fruity in the beginning due to its raspberry note. The drydown is almost indistinguishable to me. Not exciting, but a soft, nice scent for marshmallow lovers who don’t want to smell of cheap bodyspray.
Not for me but I can’t imagine why someone would mind someone else wearing one of these.
———-
PS: Ok, apparently some others do find this intense. Weird, I sprayed it on me at least three times and always found it soft. Maybe I can’t smell a note in this. I will leave my review that way as this is my honest opinion after testing carefully.
Bufferofe – :
Ohhh I had such high hopes for this one! I have the original Pour Femme and absolutely love it. I was hoping for something with a bit more punch, so blind bought this one off Sephora’s website.
First, let me start off by saying that the scent is absolutely beautiful. Beautiful!! Very similar to the original, but with a little more depth. However, where it gets disappointing is in its performance – this has literally zero projection, and even worse, zero staying power. This perfume is anything BUT intense! The original is much stronger, and lasts way longer, than the Intense version. I thought maybe it was just my nose (we all know how we often can’t smell a fragrance on ourselves shortly after wearing it), so I asked both my husband and my mum to smell my arm directly, and they both said they smelled something very faint, if at all, and this was not even an hour after spraying two sprays on my skin. They had to press their nose up to my skin to smell anything.
I so wanted to love this, but after trying it one more time and literally dousing myself in it with the same results, it went back to Sephora. If you love the original, stick with the original.
Zlodey – :
Marshmallow, Orange, Neroli blended, this smells like soft honey on my inner elbow for about 4 hours which is where I’ve tested it for 5 days. Same in the left wrist today the pink juice is a little different. Not so cozy. Lighter sweetness.
Not cheap fruitchouli sick. Not vanilla. Not on me.
I shy away from some very well blended perfumes because they smell trendy or dated. This is neither this can be your signature scent. Like the Creed or Chanel that is correct for you. I do agree with the other reviewer you will be hard pressed to find a hater here.
It’s 70 degrees here & this isn’t remotely sickening.
Now I don’t have the ability to describe scents the way some people here do. I dislike most of the cheap florals & I don’t mean $$$ wise, have worked in fragrance & have a basic understanding of what ur paying for. Laughed like hell when one reviewer called a $1500 bottle of Rouge reminiscent of a slaughterhouse because it’s animal/animal which is ooooh so so way too much to any slightly discerning nose that didn’t even know it was……oh so true…
I am a perfume junkie & I’m highly amused with Tom Ford Blends,
LOVE THAT SALT SCENTS ARE THE NEW IN, &
believe most scents should be retired if they capture a time frame i.e. “New West” tnx Aramis & sry to everyone that won’t give up CK ONE & every other 90’s fragrance I’ve been smelling my whole life, with very few exceptions Chanel’s, Shalimar, etc…This could be a keeper….
Lilianne – :
How could I not love this one since it was given to me as a Christmas gift a few years ago by one of my sons? He knows how much I love fragrances and took some precious time during his hectic schedule to agonize over just what to get mom. Not so much what, but which what.
Initially I wasn’t terribly impressed with this lovely because it seemed so heavy, almost oppressive. During the dry down, something beautiful happened, a concert without any sour notes but in complete harmony. Breathe in, close your eyes, and take a deep breath. Mmmmmmmm. Of course the fact that it was selected with so much love and TLC had a lot to do with it, too. The anxious look on his face when he asked “Do you like it Mom?” and he promptly beamed when I responded “I love it!” It lasts for hours on me and gives a terrific sillage. My favorite winter scent. It’s like I’m wrapped in a big hug from him every time I wear it.
FENOMEN – :
not intense , not worth the money. the one is much better.
аромашка – :
This has really grown on me. When I first tried it, I thought meh, it’s too soft. It was gorgeous, don’t get me wrong. But my skin eats perfume so I tend to go for the biggest of the big ( al la mugler). But as the day wore on, I was getting lovely wafts of raspberry and marshmallow. And I kept getting wafts. It’s a much more delicate perfume than I’m used to, but certainly not to be ruled out! I need to learn that scents don’t need to be shouty all the time to be appreciated 😉
attatueronnal – :
mmmmnnnn… I really am struggling to decide whether i prefer this intense version or the Pour Femme version…… I originally bought the Pour Femme version to which i absolutely loved, yet found it didnt last a long time, i couldn’t smell it after a while.. A perfume sales person once told me that if you cannot smell perfume on yourself then that is because it works with your chemistry!!!!!!
( although i really hate strong perfumes that you can follow around a store behind a person…….. alien esscence absolue is a fine example of this )…. back to my review….Due to Pour Femme not seeming to smell after a while i was recommended the INTENSE version, At first application i was really unsure if i liked. i think i was comparing the top notes to Pour Femme, i decided to leave it for a while and go back to wearing Pour Femme…… A few months later i came back to INTENSE to give it another go…. sick of wasting perfumes by giving them away.. as this turns out a very expensive hobby.. This time i think i like, it has a different opening than the pour femme version but i am not good at explaining notes or even picking them out but love the sweet marshmallowy type note.. i will keep going with this one prboably more as a weekend or evening perfume
moinnaGainouh – :
Very creamy lovely sweet floral perfume. It’s not too sweet for me, and marshmallow is usually too sweet and not my favourite thing, but it’s lovely in this; it gives a very soft, gentle creamy cushiony feeling. The tuberose is very pretty, and so is the neroli and orange blossom, and the green mandarine gives a beautiful tart intensity. And it’s a beautiful gentle sweet milky sandalwood too.
I really love it. It is deep and feminine, sensual and romantic. Gorgeous. Really gorgeous, and I love the bottle and its glorious colour. Very sensual and intense and glamorous. I love wearing it, because I love it, and everyone else does too so I’m always getting lovely compliments. And my husband adores it! Which adds to my pleasure completely of course.
DisaPV – :
I like D&G pour femme. My sister uses it all the time and gets compliments wherever she goes. She is really into sweet scents. However, I love pour femme intense. It should definitely not be called intense because the original pour femme is much more sweeter. Pour femme intense is much more creamier and smooth due to the sandalwood and tuberose. It gives a really warm and cozy vibe in the colder months. This perfume is highly attractive. There is nothing that i do not like about this perfume. I love its sleek bottle/packaging and also its attractive ad. I have not met one person who does not like this scent. i recommend it to all ladies. x
P.S. i have a friend who is a big fan of sweet scents. I sprayed three different scents on the paper strips and told her to pick her favourite. Without acknowledgement of which perfume it is, Pour femme intense is the one she picked! 🙂
PORTUHALEC – :
Tried it from a small decant recently and I liked it
I’ve not tried pink one yet so I can’t compare them but I want to explain intense’s scent briefly I’d say soft,creamy sweetness with a hint of citrus
White florals,sandal and marshmallow blend to produce a very creamy but not heavy sweetness and a hint of sweet orange keeps it fresh
I find it nice.warm and comfortable and it gives a clean feeling to skin,like a creamy and fluffy white feeling
Sillage isn’t really huge but staying power is good
I’ll consider buying a bottle if I find it dlfor a good deal.I wish I can find a 50ml of it
BAST888 – :
This is not good. It’s a soft perfume, a little sweet. Opens with a pop of orange and white flowers before settling into what should be marshallows but turns into the scent of multi-vitamins on my skin. Extremely soft sillage. Not a winner, which suprises me. I slightly prefer the original (the one from a few years ago, not the original from the 90’s because that is an entirely different perfume).
oum166Unlogrere – :
It is anything but intense!
A rather gentle marshmallow scent liven up by orange and neroli.
Could be called sweet, but intense?
stasy79 – :
Pour Femme Intense – interesting reactions over such a tasty formulation. I would caution: you must love a high dose of tuberose and sandalwood to enjoy this fragrance. If you enjoy those notes you will be happy to find that this fragrance can be a bit of a chameleon. While tuberose and sandalwood are very prominent notes the other notes develop differently depending on the weather. I have enjoyed it the most in the warmest days of summer. The heat turns up the marshmallow and citrus notes creating a sultry vibe sending tuberose and sandalwood to the background. Now that cooler weather is right around the bend, I cannot wait to experience what may unfold.
Sillage goes on moderate and wears soft while longevity is anywhere between 5-6hrs.
desiree – :
I agree with the posts that note a ‘urine’ smell. After all the synthetic sweetness and citrus (which is not entirely unpleasant) evaporates, a completely discordant civet-cumin smell rises up in the dry-down. It smells absolutely disgusting on me. I have a 25ml bottle which I would trade for an equivalent size of any other perfume but this. I can enjoy discordant or ‘challenging’ fragrances, but this just smells unhygienic.
aslan – :
Nuxe Prodigieux on steroids
greebcorn – :
Wow. Yes, everybody who rejects using words that demean a group of people are obviously just defensive because they belong to that group.
Hmmm…sounds eerily familiar in this current climate.
NathanWS – :
@ViolteNoir: you are definitely right, you didnt write anything bad. the problem is on the side of those, who feel offended because they are aged. only their problem, though! 😉
Boss_SlaM – :
So true socorrosouza!!!!here,here!!
byyf – :
Perhaps because you equate age with what you think are bad perfumes.A person doesn’t turns into a scents fiend just because s/he ages, s/he doesn’t automatically smells bad because s/he has aged. Besides, if there is any certainty in life is that the only alternative to not age is dying young.
stas_usa – :
I tried a sample of this on the other day and thought…mmmf, ho-hum. I walked outside of the store with a slight breeze blowing and got a gentle waft of this…mmmm! I went right back in the store and bought the rollerball. I don’t usually go for sweet scents but the formulation is just right…wow!
It is perfect for autumn and somehow reminds me of a velvet blazer. Very soft and feminine …makes me think of a great night out my husband in an upscale restaurant. Give this one a chance ladies..it may surprise you…it did me!
Greetwarm – :
Wouldn’t it be nice if someone could review a perfume without insulting an age group?
annenaichok – :
i really really really love this type of scent. It’s that powdery, sweet, lightly floral scent but its still youthfui not like an old lady. I can definitely tell a difference between Pour femme intense and pour lemme original, they are both nice, i think the intense version is a more citrus orange, the original was more raspberry sweet. I love the Marshmallow note, it is like a bubble or cloud of sweetness, it leaves a lovely trail. the man in this house really loved it too.
Evgeniy67 – :
Love-hate relationship – becauase of the warm smell, it gives me a sense of romance and feminity. also i feel like it smells like the warmth of the body underneath the clothes in winter time. Still the sweetness of it is so strong sometimes it makes me a little sick, like a ate a ton of gummy bears at once, but sometimes , i dont know why, it doesnt make me puke. :))
Also when i spray it , i dont smell anything at all…But after 30 mins or so, it just explodes…and it’s very heavy… kind of shocking
ViTan1975 – :
i don’t like that sweet but with this perfume it give me little feeling of warmth really its touch the romantic feeling.
alex1977 – :
I have it. I dont think it should be called intense… It should be called D&G deep dark secret. Now that sounds more like it
7manuc – :
I don’t really love this one, the tuberose is a bit much paired with sugar sweet marshmellow.
not for me.
I gave it to my younger cousin who loved it. she is normaly a Black XS
good sillage and longevity.
lis8080 – :
Nice but I prefer Aquolina’s Pink Sugar (Not the Pink Sugar Sensual) to this one. Pink Sugar has cleaner base notes.
aeyvetara – :
Highly pleasing, this one. White and fluffy, impossibly soft. I have only smelled the original Pour Femme on paper in a department store, and it was overly saccharine. I don’t find this one as nostril-frying. Hardly deserving of the name “Intense”, though.
vasus – :
Pour femme edp is a cooler smell, this intense pour femme is warmer.
Both nice.
Cheese cakey actually. Nice and rich.
It’s very tasty.
Not over the moon about the lasting power though.
I detect similarities in the dry down with untold absolu
Hmmm, I might buy a small bottle if I see it on sale, I would not buy the big one at full price though.
I only had a small vial of this, but maybe using an actual sprayer might help. It’s winter here and I need to try it during the day.
alsu.sobaka – :
I adore Light Blue. but this one is too sweet. I will try the orignal (Pour Femme). But if you are looking for an extremely clean, light fragrance with the slightest hint of powder/sweet, try PLAY for HER by Givenchy. It’s not too youthful or classic or casual. I still get so many compliments on Play, even in hot/humid 80 degree summer weather. I was at a ball game and those sitting near me asked the name and stated it smelled sooo good!
мик3850 – :
i bought this intense version as i love pour femme from 2012 . i thought the intense version would be all what the pour femme version was but maybe be a little stronger with more lasting smell throughout the day as i find pour femme the most beautiful initial spray yet it dissapears quickly…. the intense in my opinion has completely different smell, maybe i am looking for too much and cannot really drag myself away from my favourite in pour femme !!!!!!! i do keep trying it,,,,, think i will stick to the pour femme version and only use intense now and then. mmnnnnn not too sure on this one
sanek09_09 – :
Pour Femme Intense, contrary to the name, is actually a toned-down and refined verson of Pour Femme. This one is more about creamy sandalwood and tuberose, with the original 2012 Pour Femme in the background. You can definitely tell that they are sisters; but this one is quieter and less fluffy. They have different textures; Pour Femme is all poofy marshmallow and powdered sugar in texture, while Intense is silkier and smoother. I like both, but I tend to wear this one more.
metrokartawvqzaz – :
Fragrance Review For Dolce & Gabanna Femme Intense
Top Notes: Neroli Mandarin Orange
Middle Notes: Tuberose Orange Blossom
Base Notes: Sandalwood Marshmallow
This is very nice. I’d read the reviews on Fragrantica and was intrigued because it sounds like an orange flavored citrusy scent and of course with that fragrant neroli it would be. I also do like tuberose and orange blossom and sandalwood. Without that marshmallow note it would pass for a citrus chypre. I wondered whether or not the marshmallow would ruin it. It doesn’t. It sweetens it and quietens the scents that could be too citrusy and too loud. I always laugh when I read about notes like marshmallow or popcorn or sugar cotton candy. It really doesn’t go there. It’s also a quiet marshmallow that just helps in keeping the whole thing together replacing what could have otherwise been a vanilla note. Sweet and not cloying. Beautiful citrus and tuberose. Gorgeous, feminine. Easy to wear. Great for spring and summer as a casual any occasion perfume.
maximall96 – :
OK, so this is not really a review, since I haven’t tried the scent yet. Just a reflection on review etiquette and whether or not you want honest answers if you ask for an opinion about your perfume. Reading the reviews below, I’m a bit taken aback by comments calling Victoria’s coworkers jerks or a-holes. After all, she asked them-they didn’t just walk up and say “Hey you stink like urine” or something. My husband has on several occasions thought that the cat had peed somewhere when I’ve had flower arrangements with daffodils/narcissus in the room. He is not a jerk or an a-hole, he just genuinely has a totally different experience to that scent than I do. And I’m really glad that Victoria’s coworkers told her, and that she mentioned it in her review. Now I know that this fragrance is one I definitely need to try before I buy, (unless I want to risk my husband getting very upset at the cat!)
allen1996 – :
This is one of my favorite scents. A very classy sweetness. But not TOO sweet. It’s also wearable in any season. It stays delicate and light during the summer and in the winter the warmth comes out. This sets the bar against which I judge all other gourmands.
sanya. – :
I never tried the original so I can’t compare the two. D&G intense smells like marshmallow and sandalwood with some florals in the background. I really like the scent but it doesn’t have much longevity. I wish it was more intense in lasting power.
904326 – :
This is gorgeous! I get a sugary, slightly buttery popcorn vibe from it and it’s so warm and delicious..I love the marshmallow and sandalwood in this, it’s tender and sophisticated. A definite love for me!
kop292 – :
NICE ELEGANT POWDERY FLOWERY SCENT , ITS NOT HEAVY ITS REFRESHING ACTUALLY THE SILAGE IS WEEK BUT THE LONGEVITY IS GOOD.
WiwlyzZY – :
Received this in a swap. It’s okay. The marshmallow is a bit much for me. My taste in sugary sweet has kind of changed. This is a grown-up, toned-down version of Pink Sugar on me.
I think this would be nice for a romantic date, but not for everyday wear.
Average sillage and longevity.
Gremlinoff – :
I just bought the 3.3 ounce bottle, and I’m in love with it. I do wish it was more “intense”, as the name states, but I do think this smells just amazing. It strongly reminds me of my favorite, which is Hypnotic Poison. It doesn’t smell just like it, but there are notes that smell similar, and it give off the same vibe. The longevity and projection are way, way better with Hypnotic Poison though, and I only have that in the EDT version. My Pour Femme Intense is an EDT, and while it smells divine, it’s certainly not intense.
I’m glad I got the large bottle, because this will have to be reapplied during the day. It has a sweet, warm, sexy smell that I just love. I have yet to smell the original Pour Femme, and am tempted to buy a bottle off ebay, but I’m afraid it will smell very 90’s. Now, don’t get me wrong, I still like some 90’s perfumes, but I hate doing blind buys on expensive, discontinued fragrances that I haven’t smelled. I’m not sure if it’s worth buying Pour Femme the current edition, as so many people say it smells exactly like this Pour Femme Intense. Also, I do not smell anything distinctly like “marshmallow”, but that is probably where the sweet note comes from. I think this perfume is nicely blended, and I’m going to really get a lot of wear from this one. Gourmand lovers will likely love this one.
weteGedyPaw – :
Just an advice for those who have a dilemma btw the latest versions. The 2012 is sweeter and more intense than the “intense ” version. So, buy “intense” for the the summer. I Love both of them but if I have to choose , I would stick with the 2012 version.
frielaavaipse – :
I own a bottle of this and I adore it. My boyfriend loves it on me, too. I smell powder, tiare flower (my favorite), marshmallow, sandalwood, something sweet and sharp (orange?) and a bit of sunscreen (probably from the tiare). The overall impression is of a creamy white flower and good quality white chocolate. Lots of powder, too. The problem is that when I tried wearing this to work, two of my peers mentioned they were getting “whiffs of urine”. It had rained a lot on the previous night, and they thought we had a problem with water infiltration in the building. I had spritzed a small amount on my wrist on that day. Since I am friends with them, I approached them and asked them to sniff my wrist. They admitted that they were actually smelling my fragrance. With that being said, I no longer wear this to work. I tried the version launched in 2012, and believe the “urine” note is not there, probably because it is a lot less floral. I will purchase a bottle tomorrow so I can enjoy this delicious fragrance at work, without bothering my co-workers. Side note: this smells nothing like the original Pour Femme launched in the 90’s.
serg8219 – :
Me and my skin we both adore it!i need to refill soon otherwise i will be mad:) i love this fragrance!Sweet,floral in the beggining,it fits me perfectly,i also aparently can wear it in daytime without any problem,it is delicious.
Klairiecom – :
Neroli, tuberose and marshmallow are most prominent on me. Beautiful, rich scent to start with.
About 2 hours in, it weirdly turned to a dryer sheet smell? I kept wondering what it was until I realized it was me! Disappointed at the surprise twist. The first hour or so of wear was lovely, but this odd dry down will keep me from purchasing
runnei – :
Wanted to love, but this smells like watered down Pink Sugar (original). I only use Pink Sugar on specific occasions, in wide open areas (like restaurants), without being shoulder to shoulder with others. It’s so important to understand the potency level of fragrances and thus, their affect on others. A wonderful fragrance can quickly become someone else’s nightmare.
Tolstyan44 – :
Christmas eve, on the way to a family party, I detoured and went straight to the store to get a samply of Alien. While there, I explained that I was currently wearing Chanel Allure Sensuelle, and she recommended that I try this one. First thoughts were:
– I wanted to smell like Jasmine, this does not.
– I don’t want to smell like a marshmallow…why would I want to smell like that?
– the other reviewer was right! It totally smells like root beer… again, why would I want to smell like that?
I was in search of a fresh floral, that doesn’t smell tart or powdery.
After having it on for about an hour, I simply could not stop smelling myself. Like eating something where your first taste evokes a big, NO, but for some reason you can’t stop tasting it, because it has left you intrigued and unsettled.
By the 2 hour mark, I was thinking, this is totally NOT what I was looking for, but somehow, this seems like it would be a nice casual scent, when you are having a casual day, running errands, in jeans, and aren’t wanting to smell like flowers, or when you are going to work and are feeling demure. It’s a nice change from the soapy, shower gel scents.
What just happened? I still don’t know why I would want to smell like a marshmallow, but I can actually see myself getting this. I think I will try the sample for another day.
Update: I decided not to get this. The fruity/berry notes don’t agree with me. I got Chanel Coromandel instead. It is soft, warm, with hints of chocolate. Simply divine.
armahed – :
I just can’t understand the negative reviews. I like and wear the 2012 version and I bought the intense version now. I find them quite similar and I love both of them . Ok, the previous old red cap version was a hit perfume in the 90s but I think it is a little dated now.I couldn’t imagine me wearing this in 2016..Anyway, the latest versions are two of the best new arrivals in the perfume industry. What do I mean? Just try all of these new sweet perfumes (within great bottles I must admit) that have been released recently. Can you recognize them? Can you tell if sb wears a specific one that you cannot forget? I guess no. On the other hand, Intense as well as the 2012 version are well blended in order to have an elegant character that defines the woman that wears them. She follows his era but without being a fashion victim. She is confident enough and doesn’t need a sillage monster to make an impression. She has class and a good taste. So that’s D&G’s latest versions all about . It is pure class and quality.
941 – :
It’s like a more concentrated version of the original and I really love the tuberose in it. I just can’t figure out why the longevity is so poor, compared to Pour Femme.
moros36717 – :
This perfume is like a sweet hug. I had to try it due to the marshmallow base. That’s what attracted me! The perfume represents the word mum for me and the word ‘intense’ fits the deep white flowers tone that is missing in the classic version. It’s sweet but mature, strong but not powerful, sexy but classy, deep but not enough. I would recommend this perfume as a safe present in the more mature crowds since my mum is an aquatic/fresh perfume fan and she loved it!
lion1630 – :
Simply beautiful! Both my friend and I fell in love with it! (me months before her but I when introduced the scent to her, she was the one that pushed us to buying, that’s what friends are for :))
It manages to be a complex and changing perfume with such few notes. Flowery then warm and sweet, it projects and stays on
yes216500 – :
when I first tried this on in the store, I got a beautiful opening of white florals. I enjoy white florals as well as sweet scents & gourmands, so I thought this would be a home run. unfortunately, the dry down became so sweet it was nauseating. this might be a good choice for