To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
nikell – :
I don’t agree with all the people who say that this flanker and the original have the same juice but just with different package to catch the collectors’ attention!!
NO sir; as a matter of fact I’ve never enjoyed the original decadence and never considered to have it in my collection even with its gorgeous bottle!, to me it is super artificial, plastic-like scent, and just too much for me to bear!, whereas when I was in the perfume shop months ago, the buyer there asked me if I can try this flanker, and I immediately said “noooo, me and decadence are not friends at all”, but he insisted so much to try it, and I accepted believing I won’t enjoy it!
But, what?!! wait, is this a flanker for decadence!! WOOOW, it’s soo different!
Its’ woodsy, powdery, elegant, and has the perfect amount of sweetness, sillage is so good,longevity is amazing!
shrekspb – :
Just exactly like the case of the whole Mugler Angel Eau Sucree line, Decadence line has different bottles but the juice inside still stays the same (as long as they belong to “Decadence EDP” line, and not “Decadence Divine EDP” line. It is mentioned above on this page. “Eau So Decadence” however takes on a different direction, sort of like “the EDT version of the Decadence EDP”).
If you wanna collect the “purse” bottles, there you have it. I think they are very well made, chunky, heavy and super cool looking in reality. I just haven’t seen the “crystal” one sold anywhere yet. I bet it would be gorgeous.
sre012JeomiWogkig – :
Here is my question. And maybe it is marketing genius on my part…. why not encapsulate the perfume somehow in the bag and make it work both ways? That is , after pulling the inner casing out”Voila!” An evening bag is born! Women would love the extra perk!and what if a little perfume spilled on the bag? Not a problem—no more than perfumed gloves bothered Elizabeth the First.
Alexandra_fromAC – :
Weirdly this flanker and one eight k edition, has the same ingredient pyramid! But forsure I find this one a way better than the original!
naise – :
He really couldn’t make this smell slightly different??..
artemiev – :
There’s a Swarovski edition of decadence I haven’t seen on here yet. Really cool bottle.