To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
kopterka – :
I wore Mary Chess Carnation and Mary Chess Tuberose perfumes in the late 1970s and early 1980s. I haven’t sniffed either in years, so this review is based solely upon my memories. I mail-ordered both from one of those discount cosmetic catalogs that came in the mail back in the day (“Beauty Buy Book” was the name of one of them).
TUBEROSE was a bit disappointing for me, as it didn’t smell like its namesake at all on my skin. Of course, I was looking for something like Fracas, which has been my favorite fragrance since I started wearing it in the 1970s. Instead of the creamy (yet sharp) and sweet (yet earthy) scent that I associate with tuberose, The Mary Chess fragrance was was heaver and warmer – this sounds odd, but something in it reminded me of Faberge’s Tigress or Frances Denny’s Hope. I recall that it was sweet, and what I would have called “old-fashioned,” which makes perfect sense since it came out in the 1930s. A nice fragrance, but not at all what I was expecting. I see that the Vermont Country Store sells something called “Mary Chess Tuberose Gardenia.” I have no idea what it smells like, but I’ve heard bad things about other vintage fragrances that VCS stocks remakes of.
CARNATION, though was exactly what I was hoping for – it really did smell like carnations, or other flowers in the dianthus family, with a little clove and vanilla thrown in for good measure. In fact, it’s the closest to the real flower that I’ve ever experienced in a perfume. Some of my friends thought that it smelled like a man’s cologne – perhaps the carnation scent is more prevalent in masculine fragrances rather than feminine ones.
I hope that someone out there in perfume land can sample some of the actual products and let me know if I’m remembering them correctly.