To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
ubineks – :
Plus glam’ tu meurs !
Supermen26 – :
My bottle is a mini with a gold cap which I wear sparingly. I wasn’t too impressed the first time, but it grows on me. Its bright fruity herbal opening gives a fun and naughty vibe. It turns a little earthiness from the patchouli and oakmoss. There is a violet flower undercurrent (maybe from heliotrope and vanilla). The peach is a little musty because of the patchouli I think. It was reviewed to have a cherry liquer note which I cannot find even after wearing quite a few times.
Overall, it is a glamorous 50’s perfume but doesn’t take itself too seriously.
rakhimbigtorrent – :
This one is a difficult to find vintage perfume, and finding any accurate notes for it are difficult as well. It definitely is a fruity chypre with a peach note, but it’s not the sort of peach that’s in Mitsouko, which uses aldehyde C 14 to give it its peach scent. The peach in this is not as lush and fruity. It’s even more bitter and non-sweet than Mitsouko, dark and almost acrid at times. I have a bottle of EDT, so I would really like to be able to get a bottle of the parfum, because I don’t get any “cherry liqueur” note as is attributed to it.
I found another site that said it’s a woody musk. It has some woody notes to it, but I wouldn’t say it’s a musk. It’s a definite chypre with the crisp dryness from oak moss.
This perfume was brought out in the early 1950’s, and it has that feel of being worn by a woman at that time with a crisp white blouse, a day suit that women wore in that era, and high heels, and a fine hat. Something to wear during the day for luncheon with gloves and shopping in couture stores. I can’t say that I’m in love with this, but it’s an interesting experience perfume. Wish I could find a well preserved bottle of the parfum, but from the ’50’s a well preserved chypre is tough to find.