To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
becas – :
i’m not sure if i’ve got the same aura judging by the reviews. to me it doesn’t smell like a floral fruity. it smells weird. maybe its the tea but tea should’ve left by now. it smells , to me, like old musty laundry detergent or a cheap musky hand wash. couldn’t stand it any longer. had to wash it off and i can still smell it. it smells similar to balmain extatic and the common note for these 2 dislikables is lithchi. i’m new at this and it’s a good thing when i can pinpoint notes that i like and dislike.
so its thumbs down for me on this one.
alf266 – :
Sweat heavy floral. Although they don’t share any of the same notes, this reminds me a lot of Truest by Tiffany. Since that one is hard to find, this is a decent replacement.
sawentiy – :
It’s beautiful elegant floral perfum which I fell in love with. I’ve always loved original scent of Aura but this one is more romantic.
akmal-k – :
Beautiful floral fragrance, very elegant and tempting. It has very good longevity on my skin. I can smell it very well now after more than 4 hours.
When I look at the notes, I am not surprised that I like it! Good floral scent should be moderate IMHO.
Update: Musky base is incredible! Lovely!
Update2: I’ve tested it again and I must say that the word that describes this perfume the best, is: feminine.
hyq653JeomiWogkig – :
Haven´t tried it yet. But the bottle is magicaly beautiful!
Koykushin – :
An exceedingly beautiful floral perfume which is long lasting and as captivating as the original fragrance.Fabulous.
zavyalov-4 – :
This is sort of a ‘nothing’ smell, vey disappointing and poor projection and longevity. It opens as a fresh rose and smells quite promising, almost resembles Lanvin La Rose on opening but then ‘puff!’ it disappears into thin air within few minutes and can’t be smelled again (ever most likely!).
Maybe Swarovski should stick to making what they are good at…jewellery!
rodrigues-ekt – :
disappointed: (smells very cheap…like some common hair styling products scent
All Swarovski perfumes have nothing special but the bottle~ Why do they just made the bottle for other houses, or sell fancy purse spray separately, hahah~
djaldy – :
very light . fresh . beautiful . romantic
!!
feu986elipseskism – :
How annoying is this? They’re making a FLANKER already and the United States hasn’t even gotten the first one!