To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
blinkblink – :
This makes me dizzy. Very vexing and sickening, like a cheap old-fashioned perfume for girls under fifteen. 0/10.
ёманарот – :
Very one of a kind in my opinion.
Citrus on metallic plate.
gerus1971 – :
Usually I am not crazy about hesperidé perfume but here I was totally seduced by the association of Comme des garçons and Andy Warhol. You’re in is a modern and ”urban” twist on that very classic family perfume.I was really surprised to enjoy the metallic note. Like Mark Behnke from the Colognoisseur’s blog that metallic note remind me the fog used in the 70’s and 80’s in many disco clubs. For a citrus You’re in have a good stay and the packaging is a collector one.
kifya – :
A very light, practically non-existent scent that lacks character. Nothing stands out. If CdG Soda was a bottle of sprite, this one is a perrier gone flat. Literally getting the scent of a cold glass of water, with just a touch of something that tickles the nose, maybe a touch of aldehydes. Not sure what the point of this one was
filya – :
Somewhat between the total refinement of Chanel’s Eau de Cologne and the synthetic strength of Comme’s own Soda this might just be the most original offering from the house since their 2011 new Eau de Parfum. And the fact that they brought Maurice Roucel on board for this adds an interesting aspect – indeed a certain particular muskiness for which he has been so celebrated since his works for Helmut Lang are somewhat present in this one. Well done.
cfyntxybr – :
This is a scent that is somehow both familiar, yet very strange and alien. So in that regard, I guess it nails Warhol and his art.
It starts with bright orange, pungent coriander seed and metallic aldehydes. 15 minutes later, a musky jasmine starts to appear and the coriander takes centre stage and that’s it, really… Not much changes from that point on and You’re In begins it’s journey to the end which comes an hour or two later.
This is a nice enough scent that fits the wearable weird that Comme des Garcons can pull off so well and unfortunately lately have often failed at, instead giving us uninspired commercial scents instead of something unique.
One of the better of the recent scents that this lives in similar company to is Gosha Rubchinskiy. They both have a similar contrast of pungent and bright, although this is a lot easier to pull off than Gosha, and is less cloying and in your face and confrontational. I suppose it really is the sensitive artist to the cool skate kids Gosha Rubchinskiy takes inspiration from for his fashion line and scent.
From my sample I get a few inches of projection and the usual so-so longevity that accompanies any Comme des Garcons with prominent citrus notes. Although it is still interesting enough that I might just pick up a bottle at some point. The choice to pick from a selection of Warhol quotes to adorn the bottle is also a nice touch.
On a side note, to the reviewer below who commented on the name sounding like “Andy Warhol’s urine…” well yeah, that’s literally the point. It’s a pun Warhol used for the name of a piece where he filled coke bottles with cheap perfume to try and piss off all the fame-chasers that were hanging around him.
kupviagru – :
That “estate” of his is MILKING his image and name like crazy. Why do I suspect that all the older adults are gone and now nieces & nephews are buying Porches and McMansions off the money. Hmmm…..
Very sad.
Also see the estates of Jimi Hendrix, Bob Marley and Marilyn Monroe for more legalized memorial-prostitution.
Fooey!
buywowgoldxke – :
Alright, I’ll bite.
What an unfortunate name. Rolls off the tongue sounding like “Andy Warhol’s Urine,” which does NOT sound like anything I’d ever want to smell.
Even if this stuff smelled like the ambrosial rainbow farts of flying unicorns, I’d still think “Andy Warhol’s Urine” whenever I see this name. Yikes!
Looks like someone skipped the focus group.
tsdam – :
I have sampled a few things today so I will take that into account. This is a skin scent at best. Has that post modern clean smell but I think other fragrances i.e. One of Those Oxygen(80). I get a few of those notes listed like the metallic note and the citrus but they are faded into one another and don’t really stand out. This is not bad but just does not have enough identity for me to fall in love. I like the packaging.
dirtydogg – :
A very pretty bright cologne of bitter orange sweetened by white flowers. It’s primarily a natural smelling citrus floral, very clean and modern with no unexpected twists or turns softening to a lightly powdered sheer amber base.