To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
ber797 – :
Despite being named after someone who seemed allergic to sunlight, this is a very outdoorsy fragrance: green and herby at the top and reminiscent of freshly-sawn wood at the base. A clean and astringent fougere that works for outdoors use all year round, although is probably at its best in autumn.
temnikov1969 – :
A citrus and hint of liquorice opening. Fresh and green. This settles down into a spicy, woody musk. I get no hint of jasmine, this is not sweet at all, a very fresh, green, sharp fougere. I really like this. It is so green it has a bitter note. It is not powdery despite a clear sandalwood and musk undertone.
Another clean aromatic fougere (loved vintage Givenchy Monsiuer which had more layers than this)
WelfJealiah – :
This isn’t a bad scent, but it’s not something that really captivates me.
It’s quite pleasant and very green to my nose.
The longevity and projection aren’t great, but I can’t complain much given how little this costs.
To be completely honest, I think this smells extremely similar to The Body Shop’s Rainforest hair shampoo and conditioner.
If you like the smell of those products and would like to wear it on your skin, then check this fragrance out!
нгкфнф – :
It is exactly the same fragrance as Guy Laroche Horizon, i literally cannot tell them apart, so same rules apply I guess, really nice in an unusual Synthetic Sea type smell. I like it, but I don’t love it. Very unusual
2011сергей – :
Like 90s money, that scent of just slightly dated luxury. Delightfully synthetic, it brings to mind a manufactured memory of being seated behind the wheel of a brand new car, stuck in a traffic jam on a sunny friday morning in 1998; late for some important meeting, with just enough time to glance over the day’s headlines filled with dot com era optimism. Ahhh, the encroaching infinite possibilities of the new millenium…
busdriver589 – :
I must admit I still like this. Maybe it´s because it´s weird and peculiar, also very synthetic. I don´t know, I like it, could have been a niche.
evgen071 – :
I received a sample of this cologne when I bought my last Dior Jules; it’s strong and weird! To tell the truth, I didn’t like it, so, I wouldn’t use something like this.
UPDATE: On second thought, it’s not that strong or bad, and I’d use it occasionally.
TillDeetBuime – :
The following info should be helpful
1- Its price hovers around the $20 mark
2- The packaging has $ $ $ signs and thats open to individual interpretation
3- The bottle is reminiscent of Salvador Dali pour homme (Another Artist’s fragrance)
4- The packaging resembles the original package of Aramis Devin (green and large) Lovers of powerhouse fragrances will be taken in by this
5- It doses smell green at first really sharp green and It projects moderately through temp of 28 degrees celsius with light rainfall (Nigeria) after 5 hours of initial application. It will probably project hugely at our usual peak temps of 38-40 celsius. It would probably suit lovers of celebrity scents but it may spook the fresh/ aqua/ water crowd. For lovers of classic powerhouse scents, this fragrance could be as a reset to zero your olafctory senses so you can have a renewed apprecaition for the other scents in your collection. Nothing gets me like temporary anosmia to the drydown of some of my favourites. I suggest you use it for couple of weeks before coming to a final decision (a) Archive it as part of your collection (my Choice) thats why its a collection!! (b) give it away its less than $20 bucks and the beneficairy will be pleased.
The drydwown is fresh green and stable and smells exactly like Annuci which smells like Jacomo paradox.
fpth,fql;fy10 – :
This fragrance on my skin smells very synthetic , Its not the sort of scent I want to wear really or would feel comfortable wearing – I dunno why I think its just to ‘arty farty’ I couldnt take myself seriously whilst wearing this
mr.kosyrenkov – :
A fine Fougere, nice flowery drydown.
Basenotes very long lasting. A favourite amongst my Fougeres.
kisa13.03 – :
On my skin long-lively smell of well made, explicit synthetic and fresh impression of modernity. Matches very good what Andy Warhol seems to stand for. One of my favourites.