To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
romashka-mai11 – :
A quite soapy and somehow metallic fougere.
Powdery and spicy. Labeled here as unisex, but I find it to be leaning quite a lot to the masculine side. Opening with bergamot & citrus, after about 20 minutes enters the drydown with lots of lavender, clary sage with a shot of geranium, cedar and fern thrown in the mix. The base consists of oakmoss, tonka and some musk. To me it seems strong in projection and very traditional. If you’re into early 80s types of masculine soapy scents, this could be for you.
qupuyepr – :
I love this but would give it a minute to become itself. It has different stages, all nice, and I think it smells quite grand. Definately unisex.
вова1995 – :
To me it smells like Paul Sebastian Fine Cologne, but it is more refined. Less sweet and a bit soapy with dominant Lavender. I have the new reformulated version and I quite like it. I am glad that I never smelt the vintage stuff, not because I don’t think the vintage is better, but because my experience with the new edition is so good that I don’t want it to be ruined if I smell a better formula. I recommend it to new buyers who never smelt it before, not for vintage lovers.
zharkov – :
I don’t know if i have the vintage of the reformulated version but i like it. It is to me one of the most dry and herbal of fragrances i have found as of yet. Not soapy at all. Most prominent ar the lavender and sage followed by the vertiver and orris. No musk but some oakmoss in the base. It is a very clean smellig fragrance.
wnuevljlvx – :
I owned also the original fragrance, which i loved and used for about 10 years. This one now must be a reformulation, as the soapy element dominates all other ingredients. Abolutely not my cup of tea. Rated 1/5
aaaaaaaa9733 – :
I owned this fragrance but I heard it was a reformulation, I didn’t like it as it had a generic soapy vibe I really couldn’t handle (normally I don’t mind for soapyness). It is strong and kind of fresh but not my cup of tea. I sold it and never smelled the vintage but this new version gets a thumbs down. Rated: 5/10.