To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
easegeosteomy – :
It was not love at first sniff. Initially, I thought Paris was better, because it reminded me Si by Giorgio Armani, but once back to the office I began to smell a very pleasing and cozy scent and, to my surprise, I understood it was the little Zara London perfume screaming out for my attention! That night I went back home with my brand new bottle!
This little gem reminds me a lot Eclix by La Peerla that I never owned but just smelt from the empty bottle of a colleague. She was sad Eclix was discontinued, I’m sure she’d love this one as a possible dupe of her long lost fragrance!
ecs165InsuffBooni – :
Interesting scent, but for me, not as good as the Paris one.not a floral fruity gourmand either, as it is rather woodsy.
Then the noticeable cherry note, mixing in with the cedar.is different…not my favorite combination, still, it isn’t generic, it is intriguing , rather soft, feminine, I don’t find it masculine one bit..for the price you get a real nice scent, a mix of everyhing in a way…it isn’t so gourmand on me, as the cedar takes over…all in all, interesting!!
I agree in the first five seconds it has an Angel vbe!
holliday – :
I know that it does not make any sense, but this smells somehow rectangular. like around the corner.
It starts sweet like Angel from Thierry Mugler, and dries down like really heavy and masculine scent. Hard to describe and i think that it is hard to wear as well.
3698741 – :
At first it was a big NO, as it reminded me the dreaded Rihanna Rebelle which is a nightmare for me.
But finally it won me over. It is unique.
Soft, sweet cacao with vanilla. It is woody enough to balance the mouthwatering gourmand side and makes it a real parisian ( despite the name London 🙂 There is a hint of wood shavings. Sweet and strong at the same time. A young woman in warm but pretty clothes with chestnut hair, glasses, white skin and peach complexion in an old library, with heavy leatherbound books and a mug of hot, semi sweet cacao.
It is a serious gourmand. Good for intellectual girls also.
Finally a good choise from Zara!!!!!