To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
iax380Negeltzex – :
Mine doesn’t say Rocks on the bottle. Do i have a new or old batch?
6АТЛАНТ6 – :
Smells really similar to the original diamonds which I have to say is the most addictive smell in the world… Rocks is slightly more masculine and deeper which I want to like more but I just don’t… Wish I did because it’s cheaper as well!
mozg147 – :
Just had a look for my review of the original but couldn’t find it…maybe I never posted one?
However, I do remember sampling Diamonds and really quite enjoying the experience, unlike this one.
Well, it’s not that ‘Rocks’ is bad, again it’s just yet another banal and ultimately pointless flanker. The whole ‘Diamonds’ thing just appeals to the pathetic desire to flaunt gaudy, bling encrusted, designer shit in peoples faces, just so the plebs can feel like they are part of the worshiped celebrity elite…well you’re not! You shouldn’t aspire to be like that anyway but unfortunately folk do and this plays right into the hands of marketing execs who create fragrances in the vein of this one to entice morons to buy it just so they feel a little closer to Kim Kardashian or some other rich spoiled scumbag!!!
Lets talk about ridiculously opulent diamond jewelry and sing songs and rap about diamonds with no consideration of where they actually come from, contributing to the suffering & deaths of thousands of Africans.
Okay! That’s off topic I apologize… rant over!
I can’t believe I keep giving these designer fragrances a chance… 2013 and 2014 have been horrific years for new fragrance the only good one I can recall is Valentino Uomo.
Starts out with a citrus/marine accord which develops into a barely recognizable powdery accord of violet and maybe some vague woods.
The opening a subsequent hour or so is alright, pretty fresh if uninspiring but the drydown…? well the whole thing is just generic mush.
More spice, more definition, and maybe some dryness of cedar and more guaic wood that’s what is needed here. Just more bravery is required to make them less boring, unfortunately…boring sells.
RackMaync – :
Tried this yesterday, its very much like original diamonds but with a less powdery scent, i actually prefer this version, its usable as a everyday scent.
7.5/10 from me!!
koksosenniy – :
Cant wait for this the ingredients look like they mix well, I’m a big fan of the original diamonds so I have big expectations for this fragrance!