To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Agogich – :
very spicy and nutty. First sprayer is very synthetic.
Денис1823 – :
When it was launched, I used to like it a lot. CÉLINE pour Homme is a perfume that can be soft while engaging. Woody, slightly spicy. You can smell the hazelnut blended with nutmeg and geranium, calming spicy fusion. Unfortunately what brings me here is the new version of this scent that I used to use and enjoy. Well, it was discontinued for a while and now,no more that suddenly, LVMH relaunches it as if nothing had happened. The scent, as I might expect, is no longer the same as the old one. Even the bottle. The former consisted of a plate (with the letters of the label) in metal, the molten glass. Now, what’s left is a stained glass with metallic silver ink. The smell became less dense, more cologne, and it’s almost unbearable. It looks like a fusion of detergent powder with some mouthwash (with oriental flavor). I might even feel something approaching the summer version of the Carolina Herrera 212 Pop or H20. Anyway, I quite liked the old CÉLINE (2001) -created at the stage MICHAEL KORS (when it was still the creative director of French fashion house). This version launched right now it’s not even close of the old one. I feel sad with this changes, when market outweighs the quality.
Scent:
Old – 4*/ 5* (9/10h, and good projection)
Current-1*/5* (30 min. EDT with Deodorant Cologne
quality)
Bottle:
Old – 4,5*/5*
Current-1,5*/5*
fralgamma – :
The top notes dominate throughout here giving off a lovely zesty, woody and spicy aroma. However longevity is unfortunately poor lasting only between 3 and 4 hours. Such a shame as it really is a great smelling fragrance which is also inexpensive to buy.
pumants – :
Not bad perfumes but also nothing special. I feel nuts and wood the most with a dose of something sweet, but it’s no fruity but more floral sweetness. Longevity and sillage are average.
xamloo – :
Bought the edp recently after having the edt.Personally I think the edt was better and longer lasting but still a pleasant office fragrance with no sweetness..
out of 10 ….5.
pionchyk – :
Purchased the EDP sight unseen. Was immediately drawn to the packaging. Was not too familiar with Celine at the time. Was pleasantly surprised by the unusual fragrance. The 50ml spray lasted a few years, and when that was gone I found an EDT online. It is woodsy without being too woody, and is floral without being feminine. Although this could easily be used by women, much like Madame Mori’s HM. It opens so brightly with just a hint of calone. I personally dislike an overuse of “water” or “marine” in a cologne, but this is just the right amount. To paraphrase an old English teacher of mine: like a miniskirt, it should be short enough to make it interesting but long enough to cover the subject.
kbd183Negeltzex – :
Just got a sample of this. It’s like a light version of Rococo by Joop – but this is more complex and more subtle. Leaves a light orangey smell on your skin after a woody/hazel start and an Oxygene (Lanvin) type middle phase. It’s good, – just wish it was a bit stronger
Daxx63 – :
I agree with Kraxa.
I bought it for my teenage son on- line, untested, because of good rewievs here…
But really: Nothing.Almost.Disappointment.
Oleggst – :
I bought it for my husband about 2 years ago, on sale for under 10 quid- still sits on the bathroom shelf- there’s no way i can smell ANYTHING- just bland hint of NOTHING really;-) do you think it’s gone bad????
vitasik – :
There was very amusing story with this aroma. I have bought it absolutely casually during sales. The seller has forced me as addition to the basic purchase. It was probably 2005. This fragrance has not seemed to me as valuable. On the contrary, aroma very ordinary and brand was unknown. I used this perfume on the work and it was madly pleasant to girls. They behaved as a cat with a valerian! Really, the shock for me. I did not trust at first. I was sure that it is simple compliments. I was trying to use other aromas. But ladies demanded only this one and were ready to sniff and lick me. Really! Half a year I was the most popular guy in our office. Unfortunately, cologne has ended and it is impossible to buy. But I am grateful to this “Celine by Celine” as the man:)) not as the user, who like it.
mishagalant – :
A fresh citrus and woody scent that seems to smell like a newly opened upscale boutique to me. I love it!
bodik610 – :
Although there’s almost no note in common between Celine Pour Homme and Joop! Rococo, they are very similar. Great wood spicy fragrances that complement each other, somehow.
pro.pushkarev – :
This is such a clean and warm fragrance. It is not too “in your face”: it is pretty sexy, alluring and subtle.